Spending Money on Art

Should governments run cash on art, when they have so many early(a) important issues and concerns?  Sp hold backing on Art Art is a canonical human need. Governments have a responsibility to go along money on art for their citizens. Throughout the ages, man has tried to nominate beauty through painting, music, sculpture and other esthetic expression. It seems to be a basic need of humans to surround themselves with art. however some stack line up that government money exhausted on art is wasted, particularly when there ar so many other demands on it. This essay will witness the conflict between those who say art is important and those who feel it is a waste of money. It can be wrong for governments to cast off large sums of money on art. Too often, governments spend unwisely. They spend money on art not because a figure of speech is good or a museum is needed, but for political reasons. Cities end up with huge statues or empty expensive buildings that are used only by a few people or the elite.

Another point is that the artworks are often chosen to represent social or political rather than artistic ideas. The city gets yet another statue of the leader or an unattractive monument to national aspirations. A third point is that governments often respond to fashions, and tastes in art can change precise rapidly. Without careful advice an expensive collection of worthless paintings or tasteless productions can be the result. However, Is this the right essay for you? Watch the video below to read 2 more pages now. or If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!