Debate: Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all - Using Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

Love, Better Not

        Everyone can agree that get it on is wonderful, all when is it deserving everything? Should one sacrifice their all for bash? Scholars conclude that the key theme of Romeo and Juliet is passion. Love drives the play, as the prologue introduces the audience to a jibe of star-crossed bangrs. (Prologue, l.6) The definition of love is established as: eros, a join that brings self-fulfilment; philia, brotherly and sisterly love; and gaping, wholly selfless love. shrine Augustine once said that, It is split to nonplus love and incapacitated, than neer to have love at all. Truly, the experience of love is remote every other and every human should experience it. However, whether or not humans should experience love is not the melodic theme at hand; rather, it is whether it is better to have loved and lost or to never have loved at all. In William Shakespe bes Romeo and Juliet, it is evident that the star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet, would have been better not to have loved at all. Particularly, love has caused Romeo and Juliet to be myopic, death is the ultimate offspring of their love, and love is the reason for tragedy - not nevertheless for Romeo and Juliet, but for every character surrounding them.

        Firstly, love blinds Romeo and Juliet - all Romeo sees and cares close to is Juliet, and all Juliet sees and cares ab expose is Romeo. Being with each other is the plainly thing that matters. Love is supposed to be a heart that brings self-fulfilment, but in Romeo and Juliet, it brings violence. This play opens with Romeo being depressed because Rosaline does not return his love. He locks himself in a room and thinks of no one but Rosaline, until he falls in love with Juliet. At the Capulet party, Romeo says, Did my heart love till now? withdraw from it, sight, / for I neer saw true beauty till this night. (I, v, l.69-60) On the other hand, Juliet is only 13 and has not pull down considered marriage or love: It is an honor that I inspiration not of. (I, iii, l.71) She does not care for Paris or any(prenominal) other man, but in less than forty-eight hours, everything changes dramatically. following(a) their encounter, there is a manifestation of myopia. Romeo and Juliet, both innocent teenagers, are plagued with thoughts of suicide and a willingness to experience it. Romeo draws place a stab in Friar Lawrences cell and threatens to kill himself after he has been banished from Verona. (III, iii) He is unable to see that he is lucky to be banished and not sentenced to death.

Thy fault our law calls death, but the kind prince, / fetching thy part, hath rushed aside the law/ And turned that black treatment death to banishment./ This is dear mercy, and thou seest it not. (III, iii, l.26-30)

Just two scenes later, Juliet says, Give me some save counsel, or, behold, / twixt my extremes and me this bloody knife shall play the umpire/... Be not so long to speak, I long to die. (IV, I, l.63-67) She too pulls out a knife and threatens to kill herself if she cannot be with Romeo. These acts disprove devotion and best judgment. Education is no longer present, contributing to unless rash and imprudent decisions. Juliet selfishly wishes to end her life when she finds out she is to be wed to Paris. Her immature inability to rationalize her home prevents her from seeing options. She would rather die than to sacrifice the cost of disconcerting her parents and risk being thrown out of the Capulet house. Love destroy all moral values and led to destruction.

Secondly, the locomotes of Romeo and Juliet cannot be deserving a single experience. Both Romeo and Juliet commit suicide because of love. What good can result from suicide? Furthermore, how can experiencing love be the price tag of a thirteen and sixteen yr old? Love is supposed to be patient and kind. It does not boast, it is not proud. It is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered. (1 Corinthians 13:4-5) Romeo and Juliets love do not satisfy any of these definitions. The double suicide ironically ends both families generations. There is no evidence that Juliet would have been unhappy marrying Paris, in fact, Juliet was content with Paris until she met Romeo. Paris was a man of wax (I, iii, l.82) and Juliet was considering giving Paris her consent: Ill intent to like, if looking liking move. (I, iii, l.103) Only until after she meets Romeo is she despondent and chooses to die. slightly may turn over that their love (which led to suicide) has ended the broil between both families, but they both lost their only children. Life is sacred and perhaps the most valuable demo humans are gifted with. Ending a laughable feud is surely not worth two lives - neither are two gold statues. Optimists may also argue that their deaths were good because they will be together after death. This shows flavor in an afterlife; suicide is a grave sin, and to recall they will be together after death, one moldiness believe that they will go to hell. Nothing can be worth eternal suffering, not even love.



Simply, if they never loved, they never would have died.

Thirdly, since Romeo and Juliet have met and fallen in love, everyones well-being is jeopardized. Romeo and Juliet live only for each other and ironically commit suicide, skirt Montague dies from grief over Romeo death - leaving Montague with nobody, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Paris dies, the soak up is forced to be dishonest to her master, and the Friar is forced to be a mastermind behind plan that suffers massive failure. Juliet comes to a point where she does not even care for her family. For example, when Tybalt is murdered and Juliet is asked to allay her parents, she replies, Wash they his wounds with tears? Mine shall be spent,/ when theirs are dry, for Romeos banishment. (III, ii, l.141-143) A second occasion comes when Juliet asks Romeo to Deny thy father and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, / and Ill no longer be a Capulet. (II, ii, l.37-39) Juliets love for Romeo exceeds her love for her family. Paris, who only desires to please Juliet, is treated horribly and dies for no reason. He is repeatedly lied to and dies saying, O, I am Slain! If thou be merciful, / Open the tomb; lay me with Juliet. (V, iii, l.72-73) He shows as often love for Juliet as Romeo does, but because of Romeo and Juliets affair, he is hopeless and go away with nothing. Benvolio, the peacemaker of the play, also suffers though he does not die. He loses two of his best friends because of Romeo and Juliets love. One emotion resulted in so many negative consequences; surely they never should have loved at all.

As love is defined as eros, philia, and agape, Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet refutes the idea that it is better to have loved and lost. Eros is countered because the double suicide ends any sort of union and surely, there is no self-fulfillment in death; philia is disproved because of all the negative effects and dishonesty; and agape is negated because of both Romeo and Juliets myopic views. From Romeo and Juliets willingness to experience suicide to the deaths of five characters, love seems to promote violence. Though it was better off for Romeo and Juliet not to love, love in Romeo and Juliet is nevertheless a brutal, yet powerful emotion that captures individuals and catapults them against their world, and, at times, against themselves.

If you want to get a full essay, swan it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper