Prohibition and the California State

It was also adopted at a m when a majority of the people in the United States wanted Prohibition to be passed, though legion(predicate) may not have understood that this meant that all cloudburst beverages would be banned. The law was intended to be a clean up and not a social experiment. It was passed to improve the quality of American life. One of the reasons for its passage at the time was the increasing line of work of public drunkenness, and commentators see this as a result of the freshly world of industrialism and social turmoil then coming into introduction (Clark 13).

Various frugality groups had suggested outright prohibition of alcohol inauguration in the nineteenth century, and early in this century nearly groups, such as the Anti-Saloon unify, declared themselves in favor of case prohibition by Constitutional amendment. In 1913, the Anti-Saloon League held a parade in Washington led by children, with foursome thousand members of the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) following. These marchers met with example Richard Hobson and Senator Morris Sheppard and handed them copies of a proposed Eighteenth Amendment. This was then opposed by the U.S. Brewers' Association, but the incompetence of this system in carrying out its face-off may be one of the reasons the Eighteenth Amendment eventually did pass. The Anti-Saloon League and the WCTU were sympathetic to equal rights issues, for instance, while the brewe

Gilbert M. Ostrander traces the prohibition con shed light onment in atomic number 20 as far back as 1848, meaning that at the time California entered the Union, the country as a whole was undergoing the foremost national wave of prohibition. California then had a gold-rush federation that was attacked by the temperance movement in an attempt to plication it into a teetotaling society. The movement was strengthened after the Los Angeles come to boom of 1887 as prohibition-minded Americans moved to California from the East and Midwest. By the time national prohibition was about to become a reality, a state-wide majority in California selectd for prohibition, a move only narrowly averted by the landslide wet vote from San Francisco.

Ostrander states that two distinct societies developed in California, one northeasterly-central and one south of the Tehachapi Mountains. The vision was into a cosmopolitan, Catholic north and a native American, protestant south. Los Angeles would be the center of the temperance movement in the state, while San Francisco and environs would lead the diametric side (Ostrander v).

Timberlake, James H. Prohibition and the Progressive Movement, 1900-1920. New York: Atheneum, 1970.

The parcel also attacked the Anti-Saloon league as a political organization that had exerted undue influence on judges and politicians. The charges were also of the sort seen in the following passage:

There was much antagonist to the prohibition movement in California as well. A pamphlet published in San Francisco by the United California industries in 1916 addressed the issue from the point of view of diligence and stated that Prohibition as then embodied in proposed Amendments to the California Constitution and to be voted on the ballot for the pick of November 1916 "would work great and lasting injury to the business man, the rancher and the jak" (California Industries and Prohibition 3). The pamphlet further notes that Prohibition had been tried in many states and had failed. The
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!