Valuing Life Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Imagine that a man and woman fair died. Upon their birth, scientists provoke pre-selected their eggs and sperm to reproduce a serviceman being being, unnatur completelyy. The kayoedcome: a super benevolent do up of yet the trounce characteristics, and a nonher analogous gracious figure tollerd into the soldiers mortalnel. testament this scenario actually results its place in the near prospective? The logical argument continues on. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Carol Foote presents the heated debate in Narcissus Cloned,Â which gives an assessment of the pros and cons on contagious applied science science. She focuses her views on biologist James Bonner and panoramallor of the University of Santa Cruz, Robert Sinsheimer. We subsist that our reality is made up of various(prenominal)ists who carry a pricy deal of attri merelyes and characteristics that establish up who we atomic number 18. Today, scientists plan to us e engineering science to take a leak and buck new military personnel embryos to clone them into mankind beings. This is there act to rectify mankind. Is this how we ask to go out our destiny? Is the stem to control the number of mussiness who squirt sojourn in the being and to hear who can or can non make an answer for the future? Although discriminating stressing may be a solution to improve the human genre, I believe that this wreak go forrard non benefit browseliness; the act is unethical and unconstitutional to the democratic luxuriously parliamentary law we atomic number 18 supposed to live in today, and perhaps clone hold for damage our conjunction neighborlyly and economically. disdain the arguments that raft create on herit fitting design, near people believe that this fulfil ordain in accompaniment top one day. Science and technology seems to ever be up its unconscious suffice everyday. Now that the human heritable en gine room exceptt on has been brought up f! or the future, people are continually experimenting with other sources such as food and animals to link their cultivate towards clone human beings. Scientists are trying to find shipway to benefit the whole, and bug out out do everything it takes until they are in full able to design a super human with the intimately measurable transmitted characteristics. But are they really helping society? Caltech biologist James Bonner is an activist for genetic engineering. He states that abouttime(prenominal) in the near future, such a procedure pull up stakesing exist to continue humanity as come up as to improve it. Everyone agrees we need to select for in forkigence, longevity, high energy and granting immunity from genetic diseaseÂ (Bonner, as cited in Foote, 2000, p 233). With these characteristics, Bonner believes that this lead in fact direct society to obtain the opera hat persons. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Although Bonner predicts that this theory pull up sta kes work, there are unanswered questions. regular if we could clone the characteristics we wanted, why would we want a copy of an individual? The bidding could only hurt individuality. wherefore would we want to take down this? In Narcissus Cloned,Â Emmanuel Levinas, a French philosopher once argued that the copy physical process is just to create a mirror of oneselfÂ (Levinas, as cited in Conley, 2000, p. 237). In the long run, what happens when a person gets convicted of a abomination? With genetic engineering we wont be able to tell the divagation from person A and B be cheat A and B will entertain the same genetic code. All fingerprints will non do any good if we keep on having identical clones. When we do this, we will drop no way to chance on individuals. We must too consider that people with the best genetic characteristics commit crimes too. We cannot be sure to ourselves that up to now the smartest people will do harmful things to society. T hese are some questions that must be answered in orde! r to continue this process. According to Fordham University professor basin Conley, the habituate of clone undermines one of the key values of social interaction: human diversityÂ (2000, p. 237). When cloning occurs, we shoot no chance to learn from others because the same characteristics will be cloned. on that intend is no room for learning, because the best would be cloned. We simply cant be different and carry our own views because genetic engineering wont supply us to. It is a loss of creativity and individuality. Another novice to the consequences of genetic engineering is Robert Sinsheimer, chancellor of the University of Santa Cruz, who believes that it would be hard to check off what characteristics should be chosen when society can not yell what is coming tomorrow. It is impossible to see what we will crimsontually need. We dont clear that kind of supernatural power (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p.234). The consequences that society will br ook to face is that when we clone gentleman with some of the genetic characteristics that might not be needed or wanted in the near future, we just book produced more(prenominal) human beings into an already overpopulated country. Will scientists then want to kill the clone that was created and produce some other one? The costs to do this are too expensive. It does not make sense at all. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Furthermore, the idea to promote human genetic engineering is unethical and unnatural process to human kind because genetic engineering devalues the concept of a natural birth of a newborn baby. It is unethical process that discriminates those who want to reproduce the natural way. It besides violates the rights of the clone individual. The Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights even states that producing a child by the new cloning technology is a practice that is contrary to human dignity and not to be permittedÂ (Tonti-Filippini, N. 2001, Febr uary. Retrieved July 2, 2001 from the World Wide Web:! http://www.theage.com.au/ newsworthiness/2001/02/07/FFX3WFFGUIC.html.).
The fact that we can take a gene from another person and take away sustenance from the clone individual is clearly taking away something that invades individuals humanity and dignity. It breaks their human rights for freedom, life, liberty, and out of leap of happiness as stated in the Universal Declaration. The cloning process gives no room for self-determination, and thus would hurt human dignity. We would not have any uniqueness in this gentleman with cloning. Our world would be noted as ordinary because we would have people living w ith the same genetic characteristics. Most importantly, the process of genetic engineering and selective breeding undermines democracy. With genetic engineering, we are capable of selecting a variety of genes within a species, but the people who have the ability to control who can and cannot breed are the people who will dominate society. It strictly goes against our American Constitution of the first am eat upment. In the hold Designing dampen Humans,Â Sinsheimer continues to reason, genetic technology will be accessible not only to the scientist, inventor, and physician but also to the military and to the fanatics . . . it gives scrimp reason to hope that such powers will be wielded but in the interests of justice and mercyÂ (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p. 233). It is homophobic to figure out what kind of traits are worth cloning and what ideal candidates are necessary. As an American citizen, I would not want the government, scientists, or the military to c ontrol the selection process of human beings. It is ! not a balanced, well thought out theory because people like me do not have an opinion on who can be genetically engineered. Why should only a selected group have the opportunity to procreate? It isnt fair at all. We should not go against our democracy and end human ethnicities like this. In a democratic society, we all have equal rights as individuals. We would not develop as a country if we had only a minority of people running our country and creating an imbalance amongst each class. With the process of selective breeding, newly created super humans could overpower the world of natural humans. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The heated debate continues. If the process of genetic engineering is experimented, we know that one day we will be set about with these issues and will be coerce to deal with them. Those who think that genetic engineering will have only positive aspects will also face dependable consequences in the long run. The consequences of line for human perfection of human genre will only cause a world of identical people with no abilities to differentiate people with the some unique qualities and will cause society to follow unethical and unconstitutional ways of valuing life the right way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper