A&E Television Networks Essay

According to Annie Leibovitz, the brief that was elect for the call of the magazine was not intentionally or designedly taken. The picture, according to Leibovitz, was only a meter reading. (Leibovitz) However, in the end, it was still chosen to be cover shot for the magazine because of the meets fairness and unpretentious nature. We all know that John Lennon was a member of The Beatles, mavin of the greatest music icons of all time.Being a member of jar band during that time meant adapting a public image or re sete that recoil the rock and roll kind of life, behavior, and attitude, especially because Lennon was extremely renowned during that time. However, Leibovitz photograph of Lennon was far from the established image of a famous histrion who just happened to be part of The Beatles. The image was plain and unpretentious in the sense that there were no heavily implied messages or impressions.Although people would not know who Lennon was really as a person, the picture seemed to portray who he was unbounded by fame and stardom. Leibovitz was successfully able to catch up with a accredited air of Lennons h wizardst, intense yet tacit strength and influence. Leibovitz capability to lend a certain kind of powerful, individual, distinctive, and honest personality, as reflected in Lennons image, have solidified who she was, as well as her good deal and creativity, as an artist and a lensman. The Rise to FameAfter two historic period of on the job(p) for the curl Stone, Leibovitz became the magazines chief photographer. From the simple and practical image that she took of John Lennon, she was able to go beyond what she knew of photography and spr give away portrait photography into something distinctive and creative. (A&E television receiver Networks, p. 1) Leibovitz had the liberty to unfold and improve her talents, but at the same time deliver photographs that meet on inventiveness and creativity. She began taking glamorous and elabo rate images as contrasted to the simple and lackluster image of Lennon.John Lennon and Yoko Ono Rolling Stone (22 Jan 1981) By Annie Leibovitz The images taken by Leibovitz from then on were bold and modern. The picture that she took of Lennon and his wife, Yoko Ono, for the cover of Rolling Stone in January 2981, represented Leibovitz exploration of the contemporary styles and approaches to portrait photography. Another key feature of Leibovitz works was that the focus is always on different kinds of relationships, personality, and emotions.In this limited image of Lennon and Ono, Leibovitz wanted to bring out the strong ties that bind the two people to motorher as partners. Lennon and Ono excessively pictured different roles within the kind of relationship illustrated in the image with body language. Leibovitz saw the sensitivity and vulnerability of Lennon as he clang to Ono, and Onos strength in withstanding the cold. (Leibovitz, 2) The honest and unpretentious segment re presented in the picture was the strong and immovable love or passion between Lennon and Ono.As Leibovitz career advances, her works in any case amaze provocative on a grander, larger scale. Some say that Leibovitz photographs were scarce image framing the glamour and glitz of a cross between Hollywood and Rock-and-Roll lifestyle as nearly portraits taken by Leibovitz were extremely forceful and ambitious. (Stevens, p. 99) As Leibovitz received criticisms and recognition for her works, the charge on the photographs taken by her escalated, and so did her artistic visions and inspirations.If one would take the most controversial photographs taken by Leibovitz throughout the years of her career, one popular theme that brings those images together under a singular theme would be subtle yet artistic nudity. The existence of nudity in Leibovitz pictures has been one of the primary reasons why her works have received much attention from various groups and individuals, but also the re ason why her visions and inspirations remain to be that of the translation of honesty and regularity through art. C Bette Midler Whoopi Goldberg (1979) (1984)New York Magazine, 1983 The wall Street Journal, 2008 Coming to Terms with the True Essence of Portrait photography However, despite the artistry and radical messages that Leibovitz shot through her photographs, her talents were quickly categorize and judged under provocative images, which were sold and captured attention simply because of nudity. Leibovitz suddenly recognize that there was something amiss from her works and she felt that she lost the ability to capture relationships, real emotions, strong messages, and such in her photographs.She believed that portrait photography should also emphasize the relationship of the subject to the camera and the photographer in shape to produce images that are real and engaging, and not plain and empty. For this reason, Leibovitz stopped working for a month in order to figure out how she dejection improve her craft. (New York Magazine) Narelle Brennan Narelle Brennan As a Showgirl in Las Vegas As a Mother with her Two Children (1999) (1999)Women, 1999 Women, 1999 Taking time off work has helped Leibovitz get back on her heels. Although she continued to take high-profile glamour photographs of famous celebrities for Rolling Stone and even Vanity Fair, she also focused on the non-commercial fit of photography. In one book that Leibovitz and Susan Sontag were able to publish in 1999, she presented the sagacity of her artistry by taking photographs of real women from different walks of life.In this particular collection, Leibovitz was able to recapture her trademark and style in taking photographs twist a relationship between the subject/subjects and the camera and the photographer, building a relationship among the subjects, portraying real and strong emotions, integrating images of power, strength, and influence, reality and simplicity, and personality. From the images taken of Narelle Brennan, Leibovitz was able to capture who Brennan was as a person, unbounded by her organism simply a showgirl, but also as a bring of two children.The pictures were honest in such a way that it portrayed how the personalities of women change depending on the various roles that they play. Leibovitz successfully depicted freedom, nonconformity, and the need to put down biasness or prejudice when it comes to tagging individuals because of what they do or what they become. Furthermore, she was able to indicate her sensitivity in answering for Brennan, that her being a Showgirl in Las Vegas does not stand for her entire person. ConclusionLeibovitz artistry and creativity in photography have evolved through time. One may simply categorize Leibovitz skills and talents as unsettled or inconsistent judging from the diversity of the subjects and themes of the photographs that she has taken over time. However, despite Leibovitz irregular and erratic display of her talents and skills and photography, the changes that she had to see through all those years of building her career as a photographer generally defined her artistry and style.Leibovitz art has certainly improved through time and she was able to take advantage of all the opportunities to take photographs, figure out mistakes, experiment, and translate drama, emotions, passion, relationships, and such, into photographs, in order to develop her skills and talents as a photographer. Therefore, Leibovitz photography may be defined as flexible or adaptable, but at the same time reprehensible, strong, provocative, and forceful.She understood how the relationship between the subject, the camera, and the photographer should be developed in order to capture genuine emotions and feelings, relationships and connections, and bring out the dominant personalities of her subjects to add meaning to the photograph. The results were timeless and unforgettable images that would resound her inve ntiveness and adaptability as a photographer.Works CitedA&E Television Networks. Annie Leibovitz Biography. Retrieved from A&E Television Networks. 27 Apr 2009. http//www.nytimes.com/library/photos/leibovitz/brennan.html