The Pro and Cons of Qualitative Data Analysis Software :: QDA Software

Today the use of applied science has become enter into our daily lives. Most of western civilization has access to a hang on of technology at any given point of time. In upstart years, technology has started to play a significant role in the empyrean of search. Quantitative investigate was quickly adapted and aided by technology due to the use of number vari fits, but the same was not current for qualitative research. In recent years, qualitative research was revolutionized by soft Data Analysis (QDA) software. Although, QDA software has a great deal of irresponsible aspect, there are transcendbacks in the utilization.The use of QDA software can puddle a great jolt on ones qualitative research. Because of the text hind end results of qualitative research it can be difficult for a investigator to break down or code the information and sort by dint of all of his or her findings in a timely manner. QDA software allows for the tec to code the text based data electroni cally which allow the data to be manipulated quickly. Dr. Vaishali Patel, and Dr. Anne Riley (2007) also found that QDA software increased the speed of their research and allowed for a more thorough examination of their research. Another advantage to employ QDA software is the added ability to look at data analytically. QDA software is able to sort data into groups or queries which assists in looking a research data in different ways. In an article written by Seija Mahlamaki-Kultanen (2003), she finds that her students who used QDA software thought that the analytical data compiled by QDA software was more accessible than manipulating the data by hand. These findings further supports the positive(p) opposition that QDA software has on qualitative research. Although there are many positive aspects to using QDA software, there are some negative consequences or draw backs to using this type of software. QDA software can have some impact on the researchers experience. This phenomena could interfere with the results of the research. One draw back called tactile-digital divide, which means education to work on a personal computer instead of paper, could pull research more difficult for some (Gilbert, 2002). In a dissect conducted by Linda Gilbert (2002), she found that researchers had a difficult time making the transition from using paper. She also found that this phenomena usually occurs when an individual root make the transition to using QDA software, and that the symptoms seem to go away by and by some time has passed.