The political frame in Russian was an autocracy whereby the Tsar, the divine ruler, owned and controlled absolutely everything in the earth. Many of the people looked up to the Tsar like a father, not because he was inspirational or because he was prodigious but because 85% of the country, the Peasants were uneducated and so were very well controlled and influenced. If one is uneducated and knows nothing else except solid Russian traditions like Tsarism indeed no one will school principal it and consider if it really is the best option for a country like Russia, for every country has a political system that suits it. However as the peasants and proletariat became better educated they did ask questions and realised that they were under complete authoritarian control. Not scarcely would they query Tsarism as a whole but the certain Tsar, in personality and ability. For however strong the system is at controlling the largely uneducated majority, Tsarism is only as all-powerful as the Tsar is at the time.
So Tsarism in the 1900s was not very powerful because we can see that from his actions Nicholas II was inept as a leader of such a large country.
Blatant failures by the Tsar were apparent to the people of Russia; two examples, which cast questions over his ability, were the Famine of 1891 and the Russo-Japanese war. The famine was an passing bad time to be a Russian citizen, a great majority of the country was starving and the Tsar and his government had no plan or solution to help the needy. A peasant needs nothing but a substructure and food, but when food is taken out of his life then he will ask questions about why is has happened. The Russo-Japanese war was another example of a failure. Russia believed a...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment