Okay, so not only do I want to start out by evidence that this was a lot of reading on this one topic, just more importantly that it was so confusing and kind of perverted that it was very difficult to read and follow what she was actu tout ensembley trying to say about it all. Throughout most of the reading I felt that Stephanie Coontz was basically just giving us a run down of the evolution of marriage. I felt that she would say a clip period and how marriage was percieved during that period and so she would just go on to tell us a littlebit about the history of the people who took part in marrying during the time period as well.
However, I did find it helpful that Coontz take apart the information into little segments, titling it a certain way to auspicate what that entrap was going to be about. For example one piece was titled [I] t Made Me Really Sick, Just as I Have Formerly Been When in Love With My wife. This quote was said by an English diarist Samuel Pepsy when he chose to marry for love rather than profit.
He had previously lsitened to a piece of music that made him feel this way. It was as if he was so madly in love with his wife that it exclusively consumed the person that he was and would later regret. It even goes on to say that he disinherits a nephew who decided to marry for love as well. It was once said those who marry for love, have good nighttime and bad days meaning all will neer be at peace in a household.
I still find a lot of the material a little hard to grasp eventhough I know it has all happened at one point in history.If you want to blend in a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment